Single and Two Family Development Standards Update

Share Single and Two Family Development Standards Update on Facebook Share Single and Two Family Development Standards Update on Twitter Share Single and Two Family Development Standards Update on Linkedin Email Single and Two Family Development Standards Update link

Consultation has concluded

The City has updated Single and Two-Family Home Development Standards (mostly in the R-1 Zoning District). The adopted code amendments are intended to help further the following project goals:

  • Encourage more housing options
  • Increase housing affordability
  • Address existing homeownership opportunity gaps
  • Encourage healthy and sustainable communities

The amendments were adopted on May 22, 2023 (Ordinance #2023-16). The full version of the ordinance, as well as a summary of changes, can be downloaded in the documents tab on the right side of the project page.  Additional project documents, including staff reports, can be accessed on the project portal page (Case #PL2022-221). If anyone has any questions about these amendments, they can contact the Planning Division at (952) 563-8920 or planning@bloomingtonmn.gov.

The City has updated Single and Two-Family Home Development Standards (mostly in the R-1 Zoning District). The adopted code amendments are intended to help further the following project goals:

  • Encourage more housing options
  • Increase housing affordability
  • Address existing homeownership opportunity gaps
  • Encourage healthy and sustainable communities

The amendments were adopted on May 22, 2023 (Ordinance #2023-16). The full version of the ordinance, as well as a summary of changes, can be downloaded in the documents tab on the right side of the project page.  Additional project documents, including staff reports, can be accessed on the project portal page (Case #PL2022-221). If anyone has any questions about these amendments, they can contact the Planning Division at (952) 563-8920 or planning@bloomingtonmn.gov.

Consultation has concluded

What questions do you have about the Single and Two Family Development Standards Update? Your questions will be sent directly to City staff for review and an answer will be posted in a timely manner.

  • Share As this winter has been grinding on it becomes apparent that the streets increasingly become narrower. With no enforcement of snow emergency rules it seems that some streets would be hard for emergency vehicles to navigate with parked cares on both sides of the street. Shouldn’t any new development be required to have ample space for parked vehicles not to park on streets over night to facilitate snow plowing as is the case in Edina? on Facebook Share As this winter has been grinding on it becomes apparent that the streets increasingly become narrower. With no enforcement of snow emergency rules it seems that some streets would be hard for emergency vehicles to navigate with parked cares on both sides of the street. Shouldn’t any new development be required to have ample space for parked vehicles not to park on streets over night to facilitate snow plowing as is the case in Edina? on Twitter Share As this winter has been grinding on it becomes apparent that the streets increasingly become narrower. With no enforcement of snow emergency rules it seems that some streets would be hard for emergency vehicles to navigate with parked cares on both sides of the street. Shouldn’t any new development be required to have ample space for parked vehicles not to park on streets over night to facilitate snow plowing as is the case in Edina? on Linkedin Email As this winter has been grinding on it becomes apparent that the streets increasingly become narrower. With no enforcement of snow emergency rules it seems that some streets would be hard for emergency vehicles to navigate with parked cares on both sides of the street. Shouldn’t any new development be required to have ample space for parked vehicles not to park on streets over night to facilitate snow plowing as is the case in Edina? link

    As this winter has been grinding on it becomes apparent that the streets increasingly become narrower. With no enforcement of snow emergency rules it seems that some streets would be hard for emergency vehicles to navigate with parked cares on both sides of the street. Shouldn’t any new development be required to have ample space for parked vehicles not to park on streets over night to facilitate snow plowing as is the case in Edina?

    Michael Kevin asked about 1 year ago

    Thanks for your question.  Following the declaration of a snow emergency, parking restrictions do go into effect. Information about Bloomington’s approach to snow emergency can be found here: https://www.bloomingtonmn.gov/mnt/snow-removal-and-snow-emergency-information. Staff recognizes that compliance can be challenging at times.  In general, Bloomington street widths are large enough to accommodate some on-street parking while maintaining emergency access.  However, in locations that do have narrower streets than the typical standard in Bloomington, some areas are assigned parking restrictions to maintain minimum widths to ensure emergency vehicle access.  These restrictions can apply to one or both sides of a street depending on the road width and surrounding land uses.

    Regarding minimum parking requirements, it should be noted establishing higher minimum requirements does result in increased impervious surface on all properties, which can have negative impacts from a stormwater management perspective if in some cases this additional parking is not routinely utilized.  From a market perspective, staff has observed that most newer dwellings do include more parking (both garage and driveway), and it is not anticipated that this dynamic will change regardless of what the established minimum requirements.  Lessening the minimum requirement can be beneficial for households or residents who do not need additional parking spaces for a variety of reasons.  In these instances, there could be both financial and environmental benefits to requiring less off-street parking.

    If you have additional questions, please contact the Planning Division at (952) 563-8925 or planning@bloomingtonmn.gov.

  • Share I see in the proposed ordinance change that infrastructure constraints should be considered and to “avoid development that cannot be adequately served by existing infrastructure…” Many of our neighborhoods with large lots exist in hilly portions of the city.. making then both beautiful and desirable. However they also twists and turns, sometime blind corners, and not a sidewalk to be found. In those neighborhoods specifically increased density forcing increased on- street parking and traffic is not safe, and the infrastructure related to street lights and sidewalks is not there. If this code change passes, what action would you like residents to take to bring development in infrastructure light areas to your attention? What is your plan for ensuring development happens in the “right” areas with no infrastructure constraints? on Facebook Share I see in the proposed ordinance change that infrastructure constraints should be considered and to “avoid development that cannot be adequately served by existing infrastructure…” Many of our neighborhoods with large lots exist in hilly portions of the city.. making then both beautiful and desirable. However they also twists and turns, sometime blind corners, and not a sidewalk to be found. In those neighborhoods specifically increased density forcing increased on- street parking and traffic is not safe, and the infrastructure related to street lights and sidewalks is not there. If this code change passes, what action would you like residents to take to bring development in infrastructure light areas to your attention? What is your plan for ensuring development happens in the “right” areas with no infrastructure constraints? on Twitter Share I see in the proposed ordinance change that infrastructure constraints should be considered and to “avoid development that cannot be adequately served by existing infrastructure…” Many of our neighborhoods with large lots exist in hilly portions of the city.. making then both beautiful and desirable. However they also twists and turns, sometime blind corners, and not a sidewalk to be found. In those neighborhoods specifically increased density forcing increased on- street parking and traffic is not safe, and the infrastructure related to street lights and sidewalks is not there. If this code change passes, what action would you like residents to take to bring development in infrastructure light areas to your attention? What is your plan for ensuring development happens in the “right” areas with no infrastructure constraints? on Linkedin Email I see in the proposed ordinance change that infrastructure constraints should be considered and to “avoid development that cannot be adequately served by existing infrastructure…” Many of our neighborhoods with large lots exist in hilly portions of the city.. making then both beautiful and desirable. However they also twists and turns, sometime blind corners, and not a sidewalk to be found. In those neighborhoods specifically increased density forcing increased on- street parking and traffic is not safe, and the infrastructure related to street lights and sidewalks is not there. If this code change passes, what action would you like residents to take to bring development in infrastructure light areas to your attention? What is your plan for ensuring development happens in the “right” areas with no infrastructure constraints? link

    I see in the proposed ordinance change that infrastructure constraints should be considered and to “avoid development that cannot be adequately served by existing infrastructure…” Many of our neighborhoods with large lots exist in hilly portions of the city.. making then both beautiful and desirable. However they also twists and turns, sometime blind corners, and not a sidewalk to be found. In those neighborhoods specifically increased density forcing increased on- street parking and traffic is not safe, and the infrastructure related to street lights and sidewalks is not there. If this code change passes, what action would you like residents to take to bring development in infrastructure light areas to your attention? What is your plan for ensuring development happens in the “right” areas with no infrastructure constraints?

    Mona asked about 1 year ago

    Thanks for your question. Depending on the nature of the concern (parking, lighting, utilities, stormwater, etc.), staff does work with builders or property owners as part of the formal review process (zoning approval or building permit for example) to address many of these issues on the front end of the project.  All projects must comply with the City Code, which includes requirements for many of the concerns you mention.  For example, steep sloped lots are further restricted in the amount of impervious surface they can have (see Sec. 19.57.01 of the City Code).  Clear view triangle areas (aka “blind corners”)  on private lots must be kept free of obstructions above a certain heights.  People can also request that Public Works does more trimming in areas of the public right-of-way that may present obstructions for vehicular traffic.  Regarding parking, there is a process via petition by which certain areas of public streets can be requested as “No Parking”.  These are just a few examples of how issues can be resolved.  From a bigger picture perspective, staff is always willing to learn about local concerns that relate to infrastructure and development in order to try and improve the situation where possible based on our professional judgment.

     If you have any follow up questions, please contact the Planning Division at (952) 563-8925 or planning@bloomingtonmn.gov.

  • Share I am responding to the answer to the question on racial equity in housing..... I read the response but it doesn’t answer the question for me. I don’t understand what the stats in the answer represent. Shouldn’t something add up to 100%?? What are these numbers? Second, as you seek to increase equitable housing how do you know that the family who buys it will increase racial equity? This seems like an assumption that cannot be counted on. on Facebook Share I am responding to the answer to the question on racial equity in housing..... I read the response but it doesn’t answer the question for me. I don’t understand what the stats in the answer represent. Shouldn’t something add up to 100%?? What are these numbers? Second, as you seek to increase equitable housing how do you know that the family who buys it will increase racial equity? This seems like an assumption that cannot be counted on. on Twitter Share I am responding to the answer to the question on racial equity in housing..... I read the response but it doesn’t answer the question for me. I don’t understand what the stats in the answer represent. Shouldn’t something add up to 100%?? What are these numbers? Second, as you seek to increase equitable housing how do you know that the family who buys it will increase racial equity? This seems like an assumption that cannot be counted on. on Linkedin Email I am responding to the answer to the question on racial equity in housing..... I read the response but it doesn’t answer the question for me. I don’t understand what the stats in the answer represent. Shouldn’t something add up to 100%?? What are these numbers? Second, as you seek to increase equitable housing how do you know that the family who buys it will increase racial equity? This seems like an assumption that cannot be counted on. link

    I am responding to the answer to the question on racial equity in housing..... I read the response but it doesn’t answer the question for me. I don’t understand what the stats in the answer represent. Shouldn’t something add up to 100%?? What are these numbers? Second, as you seek to increase equitable housing how do you know that the family who buys it will increase racial equity? This seems like an assumption that cannot be counted on.

    mbrager asked about 1 year ago

    The numbers reflect the percentage of households in Bloomington in 2020 in each group who own housing as opposed to rent housing.  The disparities among groups reflect varying income levels and generational wealth.  To the extent that the proposed amendments lower costs for housing, they provide more opportunities for individuals who may be priced out of today’s housing market in Bloomington.

  • Share One of my favorite things about Bloomington is how I live in the city, but I also feel I live in the woods. I love the steep slopes for walking, and I love the wetlands and woods for all the wildlife I get to see. I was happy to see the proposal to change this code had a strategy to protect and enhance environmentally sensitive areas including the steep slopes and wetlands. However, as I dug deeper I learned that the MN DNR estimates MN has already lost an estimated 50% of its original wetland acreage. And the City of Bloomington owns nearly 9 acres of wetlands and natural systems in the middle of the Norman Ridge Neighborhood. How will the city protect and enhance that wetland area if the neighborhood continues to see construction and increased density? Which of these actions can the residents of Norman Ridge look out for if and when construction occurs? Has the city considered impacts on wildlife? on Facebook Share One of my favorite things about Bloomington is how I live in the city, but I also feel I live in the woods. I love the steep slopes for walking, and I love the wetlands and woods for all the wildlife I get to see. I was happy to see the proposal to change this code had a strategy to protect and enhance environmentally sensitive areas including the steep slopes and wetlands. However, as I dug deeper I learned that the MN DNR estimates MN has already lost an estimated 50% of its original wetland acreage. And the City of Bloomington owns nearly 9 acres of wetlands and natural systems in the middle of the Norman Ridge Neighborhood. How will the city protect and enhance that wetland area if the neighborhood continues to see construction and increased density? Which of these actions can the residents of Norman Ridge look out for if and when construction occurs? Has the city considered impacts on wildlife? on Twitter Share One of my favorite things about Bloomington is how I live in the city, but I also feel I live in the woods. I love the steep slopes for walking, and I love the wetlands and woods for all the wildlife I get to see. I was happy to see the proposal to change this code had a strategy to protect and enhance environmentally sensitive areas including the steep slopes and wetlands. However, as I dug deeper I learned that the MN DNR estimates MN has already lost an estimated 50% of its original wetland acreage. And the City of Bloomington owns nearly 9 acres of wetlands and natural systems in the middle of the Norman Ridge Neighborhood. How will the city protect and enhance that wetland area if the neighborhood continues to see construction and increased density? Which of these actions can the residents of Norman Ridge look out for if and when construction occurs? Has the city considered impacts on wildlife? on Linkedin Email One of my favorite things about Bloomington is how I live in the city, but I also feel I live in the woods. I love the steep slopes for walking, and I love the wetlands and woods for all the wildlife I get to see. I was happy to see the proposal to change this code had a strategy to protect and enhance environmentally sensitive areas including the steep slopes and wetlands. However, as I dug deeper I learned that the MN DNR estimates MN has already lost an estimated 50% of its original wetland acreage. And the City of Bloomington owns nearly 9 acres of wetlands and natural systems in the middle of the Norman Ridge Neighborhood. How will the city protect and enhance that wetland area if the neighborhood continues to see construction and increased density? Which of these actions can the residents of Norman Ridge look out for if and when construction occurs? Has the city considered impacts on wildlife? link

    One of my favorite things about Bloomington is how I live in the city, but I also feel I live in the woods. I love the steep slopes for walking, and I love the wetlands and woods for all the wildlife I get to see. I was happy to see the proposal to change this code had a strategy to protect and enhance environmentally sensitive areas including the steep slopes and wetlands. However, as I dug deeper I learned that the MN DNR estimates MN has already lost an estimated 50% of its original wetland acreage. And the City of Bloomington owns nearly 9 acres of wetlands and natural systems in the middle of the Norman Ridge Neighborhood. How will the city protect and enhance that wetland area if the neighborhood continues to see construction and increased density? Which of these actions can the residents of Norman Ridge look out for if and when construction occurs? Has the city considered impacts on wildlife?

    Erich asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your questions.  Regarding protection and restoration of wetlands, the City’s Water Resource staff (part of Public Works Department) works on various priority projects across Bloomington.  There is an annual pond maintenance project, monitoring of about 30 different ponds for water quality, partnership with Nine Mile Watershed District for the ongoing management of the buffer around Bush Lake, and development of a new management framework for Penn Lake to name a few. Water Resource staff also administer the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) for Bloomington, which establishes the regulatory requirements around land disturbing activities around wetlands.

    Regarding the wetland area in the middle of Norman Ridge Park, the City has no plans for any development activity within this parcel. In terms of how this area is protected, individual development or construction projects must meet City rules around stormwater management, including limits on impervious surface.  I should note that there are stricter limits on impervious surface on steep slope sites.  To meet the rules, typically on-site facilities must be provided to retain and treat a certain volume of stormwater within the site.  If there is a wetland nearby to a development site, design of stormwater systems must be sensitive to this nearby resource.

    Regarding wildlife, Bloomington does not have a dedicated program focused on wildlife necessarily.  However, the City is interested in the protection and restoration of natural resources, most specifically in City parks and other publicly owned lands.  The City adopted a prioritization plan for management of natural resources on City lands.  That plan can be found here.  The protection and restoration of natural resources on public lands helps support habitat that in turn support wildlife. Where the City’s efforts are more limited is in privately owned lands.

    If you have follow up questions, contact the Planning Division at (952) 563-8925 or planning@bloomingtonmn.gov.

  • Share The ordinance language strategy 1.2 states “Encourage age growth to occur in appropriate locations” and later “ Use land use controls to restrict development in natural areas and mitigate related impacts on natural resources.” The City owns 9 acres of wetland and related area in the middle of Norman Ridge. This is home to deer, fox and turkeys year-round. So what new development controls does the City plan to implement to mitigate the impact of increased density on this parkland? on Facebook Share The ordinance language strategy 1.2 states “Encourage age growth to occur in appropriate locations” and later “ Use land use controls to restrict development in natural areas and mitigate related impacts on natural resources.” The City owns 9 acres of wetland and related area in the middle of Norman Ridge. This is home to deer, fox and turkeys year-round. So what new development controls does the City plan to implement to mitigate the impact of increased density on this parkland? on Twitter Share The ordinance language strategy 1.2 states “Encourage age growth to occur in appropriate locations” and later “ Use land use controls to restrict development in natural areas and mitigate related impacts on natural resources.” The City owns 9 acres of wetland and related area in the middle of Norman Ridge. This is home to deer, fox and turkeys year-round. So what new development controls does the City plan to implement to mitigate the impact of increased density on this parkland? on Linkedin Email The ordinance language strategy 1.2 states “Encourage age growth to occur in appropriate locations” and later “ Use land use controls to restrict development in natural areas and mitigate related impacts on natural resources.” The City owns 9 acres of wetland and related area in the middle of Norman Ridge. This is home to deer, fox and turkeys year-round. So what new development controls does the City plan to implement to mitigate the impact of increased density on this parkland? link

    The ordinance language strategy 1.2 states “Encourage age growth to occur in appropriate locations” and later “ Use land use controls to restrict development in natural areas and mitigate related impacts on natural resources.” The City owns 9 acres of wetland and related area in the middle of Norman Ridge. This is home to deer, fox and turkeys year-round. So what new development controls does the City plan to implement to mitigate the impact of increased density on this parkland?

    mbrager asked about 1 year ago

    Thanks for your questions.  The Comprehensive Plan has an extensive list of goals, strategies, and actions in each chapter or element of the plan.  Based on the fact that the Comprehensive Plan serves as the high level guiding document or vision for the community, it is not uncommon for some of the goals, strategies, or actions to be or appear in conflict with one another.  Many public policy questions or problems to be solved are often both difficult and complex where the potential solutions may result in an evaluation of competing interests.  This dynamic can be highlighted in the strategy and action you reference from the Land Use Element, while the following goal, strategy, and actions are found in the Housing Element (chapter 3) of the Plan:

     

    • Goal 2: Provide a range of housing choices.
      • Strategy 2.1: Promote development of a mix of housing types.
        • Routinely monitor and evaluate housing supply and demand to identify underserved housing needs.
        • Consider amendments to official controls and development standards to promote a variety of housing types to meet evolving market demands and reduce barriers to creation of non-traditional housing types (e.g., accessory dwelling units, smaller lots and/or unit sizes).

     

    Regarding Norman Ridge Park, the City has no plans to change the use of this property as a public park.  In addition, due to the likely  presence of wetlands on this property, any land disturbing activity would likely be highly restricted under the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA).  You can find more information about WCA here: https://www.leg.mn.gov/docs/2007/other/070605.pdf. In terms of mitigating impacts to the park, any proposed development in Bloomington would be subject to stormwater management requirements (impervious surface limits, treatment, volume control, and rate control, etc.).  Staff reviews development on a site-by-site basis to ensure compliance with the City Code and best practices from a civil engineering standpoint.

    If you have any follow up questions or want to discuss specific scenarios, please contact the Planning Division at (952) 563-8920 or planning@bloomingtonmn.gov.

  • Share There has always been city planning. Why are you considering changing the plan and tucking in multi family homes within an established neighborhood? on Facebook Share There has always been city planning. Why are you considering changing the plan and tucking in multi family homes within an established neighborhood? on Twitter Share There has always been city planning. Why are you considering changing the plan and tucking in multi family homes within an established neighborhood? on Linkedin Email There has always been city planning. Why are you considering changing the plan and tucking in multi family homes within an established neighborhood? link

    There has always been city planning. Why are you considering changing the plan and tucking in multi family homes within an established neighborhood?

    None asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your question.  For clarification, two-family homes have been permitted in low density areas and single-family zoning districts in Bloomington since the 1960s.  The proposed ordinance would not change this allowance.  Multiple-family dwellings (apartments) and townhomes are not currently permitted in Bloomington’s single-family zoning districts, and the subject ordinance does not propose to change this allowance in any way.  Here is a link to the Use Tables in the Bloomington Zoning Code if you find it to be helpful:

     https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/bloomington/latest/bloomington_mn/0-0-0-109730 

    If you have any questions about allowed uses by zoning district or some of the performance standards included in the ordinance, contact Planning at (952) 563-8920 or planning@bloomingtonmn.gov.”

  • Share I'm not seeing info on changes for duplex and 4plex rules on bigger lots. We live on the pleasant street super block. I am interested how changes would affect our neighborhood on Facebook Share I'm not seeing info on changes for duplex and 4plex rules on bigger lots. We live on the pleasant street super block. I am interested how changes would affect our neighborhood on Twitter Share I'm not seeing info on changes for duplex and 4plex rules on bigger lots. We live on the pleasant street super block. I am interested how changes would affect our neighborhood on Linkedin Email I'm not seeing info on changes for duplex and 4plex rules on bigger lots. We live on the pleasant street super block. I am interested how changes would affect our neighborhood link

    I'm not seeing info on changes for duplex and 4plex rules on bigger lots. We live on the pleasant street super block. I am interested how changes would affect our neighborhood

    Teresa asked about 1 year ago

    Two family dwellings are currently a permitted use in the R-1 zoning district, subject to regulations around groupings of two-family dwellings.  The minimum lot size and lot width for two family dwellings are proposed to be modestly reduced.  Other related performance standards are proposed to be adjusted as well, including the front setback requirements and minimum garage parking requirement.  Finally, the approval process for a grouping of two-family dwellings is proposed to be adjusted from a Planned Development (PD) approval process to a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) process.  A two-family dwelling is considered a grouping when there is another two-family dwelling located within 500 feet of the subject site as measured along streets.

    If you have additional questions, contact the Planning Division at (952) 563-8920 or planning@bloomingtonmn.gov.

  • Share Will you be able to buy a lot in a single family per home neighborhood and suddenly turn it into a duplex and ruin the ambience of the neighborhood and lower all the other home values, with no consideration for the rest of the homeowners in that neighborhood? on Facebook Share Will you be able to buy a lot in a single family per home neighborhood and suddenly turn it into a duplex and ruin the ambience of the neighborhood and lower all the other home values, with no consideration for the rest of the homeowners in that neighborhood? on Twitter Share Will you be able to buy a lot in a single family per home neighborhood and suddenly turn it into a duplex and ruin the ambience of the neighborhood and lower all the other home values, with no consideration for the rest of the homeowners in that neighborhood? on Linkedin Email Will you be able to buy a lot in a single family per home neighborhood and suddenly turn it into a duplex and ruin the ambience of the neighborhood and lower all the other home values, with no consideration for the rest of the homeowners in that neighborhood? link

    Will you be able to buy a lot in a single family per home neighborhood and suddenly turn it into a duplex and ruin the ambience of the neighborhood and lower all the other home values, with no consideration for the rest of the homeowners in that neighborhood?

    Sandy P. asked about 1 year ago

    Two-family dwelling are currently a permitted use in the R-1 Single-Family Residential Zoning District.  The proposed ordinance would not change the use allowance for two-family dwellings.  Rather, the proposed ordinance does propose to reduce the minimum requirements for lot size and lot width that would make a site eligible for a two-family dwelling.  In addition, some miscellaneous performance standards are proposed to be revised, including structure setbacks and parking requirements.  Finally, the ordinance does propose to modify the approval process for a grouping of two-family dwellings from a Rezoning process to a Conditional Use Permit process. A grouping of two-family dwellings is defined as whenever there is a two-family dwelling within 500 feet of another two-family dwelling.


    Thank you for your question.  If you have any other questions about standards or procedures, contact the Planning Division at (952) 563-8920 or planning@bloomingtonmn.gov.

  • Share Are the empty lots facing 35 W on 83rd and 84th blocks on Humboldt being considered for this multi family housing change? on Facebook Share Are the empty lots facing 35 W on 83rd and 84th blocks on Humboldt being considered for this multi family housing change? on Twitter Share Are the empty lots facing 35 W on 83rd and 84th blocks on Humboldt being considered for this multi family housing change? on Linkedin Email Are the empty lots facing 35 W on 83rd and 84th blocks on Humboldt being considered for this multi family housing change? link

    Are the empty lots facing 35 W on 83rd and 84th blocks on Humboldt being considered for this multi family housing change?

    MaryBren asked about 1 year ago

    The lots you reference are zoned R-1.  As such, some of the changes being proposed in the Single and Two-Family Zoning Update could be relevant to any potential development that could occur on those lots.  That being said, multiple-family dwellings are not permitted in the R-1 zoning district, nor are townhomes.  Single and two-family dwellings are permitted in the R-1 zoning district.  The proposed ordinance does not propose to change the underlying use allowances of the R-1 zoning district.  You can find the use tables within the City Code at this link:

    https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/bloomington/latest/bloomington_mn/0-0-0-109729

    If you have any follow up questions, you can contact Planning staff at (952) 563-8920 or planning@bloomingtonmn.gov.

  • Share Address racial equity by identifying and removing potentially discriminatory policies What are the current racial discriminatory policies the city has in place causing racial inequity in housing options? ~ Former Bloomington Human Rights Commissioner 2016 on Facebook Share Address racial equity by identifying and removing potentially discriminatory policies What are the current racial discriminatory policies the city has in place causing racial inequity in housing options? ~ Former Bloomington Human Rights Commissioner 2016 on Twitter Share Address racial equity by identifying and removing potentially discriminatory policies What are the current racial discriminatory policies the city has in place causing racial inequity in housing options? ~ Former Bloomington Human Rights Commissioner 2016 on Linkedin Email Address racial equity by identifying and removing potentially discriminatory policies What are the current racial discriminatory policies the city has in place causing racial inequity in housing options? ~ Former Bloomington Human Rights Commissioner 2016 link

    Address racial equity by identifying and removing potentially discriminatory policies What are the current racial discriminatory policies the city has in place causing racial inequity in housing options? ~ Former Bloomington Human Rights Commissioner 2016

    Zavier Bicott asked about 1 year ago

    There is a large home ownership gap in Bloomington by race and ethnicity.  In 2020, Bloomington home ownership rates were:

    75% - White Alone

    56% - Asian

    51% - Two or More Races

    44% - American Indian and Alaska Native

    43% - Some Other Race

    42% - Hispanic or Latino Origin

    20% - Black or African American

    The affordability of Bloomington housing impacts the ownership gap.  To the extent that existing zoning standards (such as minimum unit size requirements, minimum lot area requirements, minimum lot width requirements, minimum garage size requirements, additional setback requirements, etc.) add costs to housing, the standards contribute to the ownership gap.